It might be
unwise to try to tackle racism in just my second entry. But here goes.
I do enjoy discussing issues like racism. Because they
matter. We could talk about pretentious pop star who just did something
ridiculous, or news pundit/politician who said something moronic or sports star
who did something fantastic with his or her ball of choice and how the public’s
reaction is … something. And I’m sure we’ll get to those types of issues. But
Racism is on my mind for something that happened to me this week.
I’m involved
with a group that works to promote a genre of music that is traditionally
dominated by black artists. Now the people who attend the functions of this
group are mostly from a certain era, the 1950s. And times were different for
them. Certain words and actions were acceptable then that are not so much now.
But, I want to say this up front: everyone I’ve met thru* this organization genuinely
loves the music, the people and the culture that surrounds it. And I haven’t’
witnessed any overt racism in this mixed group of people.
However, at the
last function a certain individual and I were talking about the previous event.
I should say at this point I’m purposely trying to hide the identities of those
involved because I’d hate to libel them. Again, everyone I’ve met here has been
a wonderful person. But this individual and I were discussing the performer at
a previous event. I marveled at the fact that the performer was about to turn
86 years-old. I said to my conversation partner that he looked no older that
60. And performed with a vitality of someone still in his 30s, if not younger.
The man I was speaking with responded, “Well, black people age so well.”
Maybe your gut
reaction was the same as mine when I heard the words come from his mouth. But
I’ll reserve my thoughts for one more paragraph while I tell you what happened
just after the show.
The same man
was on stage with the performers from that evening’s function, most of whom
were black. They were having a group picture taken. Afterward the man says …
Sorry, it just occurred to me that it will be much easier to speak about this man if we give him a nickname or pseudonym. Let’s see … How about Mike, Mike Check? That seems appropriate. … Oh wait! I just re-read this. No, this italicized part is me “saying” this as I’m typing right now. He didn’t say… hold on it’s about to be clear.
Sorry, it just occurred to me that it will be much easier to speak about this man if we give him a nickname or pseudonym. Let’s see … How about Mike, Mike Check? That seems appropriate. … Oh wait! I just re-read this. No, this italicized part is me “saying” this as I’m typing right now. He didn’t say… hold on it’s about to be clear.
After the group
photo, Mike says (see I told you it
would get cleared up) he says, “I’ve got a joke for you.” Now I’m going to type
the joke here. Not because I found it particularly funny or witty. But for two
reasons. 1. We need to know exactly what we’re talking about and B. If you want
to confront things that are offensive you can’t box them up and say, “no, no,
this is too offensive, we have to talk around it.” Which is why I hate the
phrase, “the N-word.” I digress. Mike’s joke wasn’t terribly offensive, just
insensitive. Here it is:
How many cops
does it take to change a light bulb? None. They just beat the room for being
black.
Okay. I just
realized I left out an important detail, one you probably assumed. And what
does that say about you and me that this detail was omitted but assumed? Mike
is a white guy.
The reaction to
Mike’s joke was mixed. I didn’t speak to anyone about it after and I can’t
speak to anyone’s actual feelings, I can only tell you what I read on people’s
faces. It seemed to me that the older people on stage, (and I’m speaking about
the black people on stage. I don’t care fuck-all what the white people thought
of it.) seemed to politely laugh and swallow the hurt it may have stirred up.
The younger people just turned and left, a gesture that neither condones the
joke nor confronts Mike about it.
I want to point
out Mike has had a long career in the music industry working with black musicians
of several “black” genres. He has toured with them, played their music as a DJ,
promoted their music, etc. I do not think he is a racist. I think nothing could
be further from the truth. If anything he probably feels like a stranger in a
foreign land. He is the outcast. At least that’s how I felt for the two years I
lived in Japan. I had the weird bulbous face with the round eyes. Everyone else
was normal.
Before we get
too far into discussing Mike motives and attempt to try him in the court of
public opinion, especially since he doesn’t even know I’m writing this. Let’s
take a GIANT step back and take a look at exactly what he said and what it
means to be racist.
Did Mike, in
fact, say or do anything racist? He stated that black people age better than
other races. And his joke was condemning the police more than anything. But it
was a white man telling a joke that involved black people. Now, to me, someone
who grew up in the 1980s and 1990s, I’ve been trained to be much more sensitive
to what I say regarding race. Whether his statements have any truth to them or
not, I’m sure he meant the first as a compliment. Yes. He generalized a group
of people based on their similar skin color. But don’t we all speak in
generalities? Lying is bad. What if I have to lie to keep a surprise party a
secret? I’m sure there are plenty of examples where a general statement is
almost always true, but not always. For some reason when we are discussing race
we can’t speak in generalities. It’s immediately labeled racism.
But are all
general statements about race racism? I think they are not. I think there are
comments that are racIST and some that are racIAL.
For me, while
lumping a group of people together and saying *this * is generally true about
this group is short-sighted and sometimes even dead wrong, unless it comes from
a place of hate, it shouldn’t be stigmatized. It is only a racial comment. And
even if it is truly racist, that is, it comes from a place of hate, we
shouldn’t write off the racist as sub-human. I’ll address my thoughts on
dealing with true racism in a later post.
But in the end,
what do I know. I’m a white man. I grew up in a all-white, racist part of the
country. I’ve seen true racism up close and personal. Maybe because this is a
milder form of racism I’m not as offended by it. Maybe because the racism isn’t
directed at me I’m not as sensitive to it. So I open it up to the readers. Was
Mike being a racist? And is he deserving of our scorn because of his
statements?
I have to ask
you to trust my judgment. I believe the man is truly a good person. He
genuinely loves the music and people of this community. He does not see himself
as superior in any way regarding his lack of pigment. But, is he and his
generation not sensitive enough, or is my generation too sensitive?
*I purposely misspell “through” as “thru” when I’m writing
casually. I can be a bit of a grammar nazi but I believe language evolves. And
so long as it is doing its primary function of transmitting thoughts between
two people it may change to fit the needs of those who use it. While I will
jump on correcting someone for using “your” when they meant “you’re” I
purposely misspell thru and tho’ (though). Those words have unnecessary letters
and their spelling should be revised to meet our current needs. We did it with
“to-day”, “chuse”, and “armie.” I will stop here in my explanation. And perhaps
I’ll revisit my thoughts on the English language in another entry.
Wow! You missed your calling as a sociologist BIG TIME! :) I would have to write an entire book to even attempt to do justice to all these issues you brought up, but I do want to add a little different perspective on something. I feel like we, as a society, are becoming overly sensitive (in certain ways) to issues of race (among MANY other things) AND I think it's REALLY unfortunate. In general, I think human nature makes each of us more likely to avoid sensitive situations, rather than confronting them and having to feel like we are walking on egg shells. In other words, I think being overly sensitive (particularly in social situations) to issues such as race can create more division rather than promoting unity. The fact is we are ALL different in some way. I think we should work toward getting to a place where we embrace and celebrate these differences rather than pretending they don't exist...and what better way to begin doing that than through humor. While I didn't find "Mike's" joke particularly funny, I didn't find it "racist" or insensitive... (Now if it had been delivered at a Klan rally, that would be a TOTALLY different story.) It just wasn't funny. I think when you are dealing with situations like this, you have to keep in mind the person's intention. If the intention is good, I think it should be accepted as such. To me, jokes are just like gifts, and I think it's a good idea to always make the attempt to be a gracious receiver. But what do I know? I'm just an illiterate, racist hillbilly from the great state of Missippi. <<<That is PURPOSELY misspelled...I think it falls in the "unnecessary letters" category, as we don't use that extra syllable where I come from. ;)
ReplyDeleteStephanie! Thanks for the comment. I completely agree that being overly sensitive shuts down our ability to properly deal with important issues like racism. I'd like to explore that in a future entry. And the Missippi part made me laugh out loud!
ReplyDelete